Dangerous drug or medical miracle? That is what Florida voters will have weigh when they vote on Amendment 2 in November.

The amendment and its supporters argue the measure zeroes in on medical marijuana, its production, possession and use.

But some opponents are raising the red flag, concerned a passing vote will lead to widespread abuse of the drug.

“When you read the entire amendment straight past the ballot language of 75 words, you’ll see the words ‘and other conditions’ in there, which basically opens the door for recreational use,” said News 13 Republican political analyst Michelle Ertel.

The Florida Medical Association issued this statement:

"We believe the unintended consequences of Amendment 2 are serious and numerous enough for us to believe they constitute a public health risk for Floridians."

The 74-word ballot, coming in at just under the 75-word limit on summing up a proposed amendment, reads as follows:

Allows the medical use of marijuana for individuals with debilitating diseases as determined by a licensed Florida physician. Allows caregivers to assist patients' medical use of marijuana. The Department of Health shall register and regulate centers that produce and distribute marijuana for medical purposes and shall issue identification cards to patients and caregivers. Applies only to Florida law. Does not authorize violations of federal law or any non-medical use, possession or production of marijuana.

So what do attorneys say? Do those three little words open the door for reefer madness?

Jaya Balani of the NeJame law firm said the amendment is very specific about who can use the drug.

“The article kind of explains who would qualify," Balani said. "Anyone suffering from ALS, AIDS, HIV, some sort of cancer. Someone who would benefit moreso from the use of marijuana than it would be detrimental to them.”

Ertel voiced more concerns regarding doctors prescribing the drug.

“If I have a headache or if my kid gets an owie, I can go to the doctor and I can get a prescription and then I can go to the dispensary,” Ertel said.

However, News 13 Democratic political analyst Jeremiah Jaspon disagrees.

"If doctors are going to prescribe it for people with a headache then they are going to put themselves in a position of liability and have their license taken away," Jaspon said. "I don’t think you are going to see doctors doing that.”

Balani said we shouldn’t expect patients to be walking the streets smoking the drug.

“The article does address that," Balani said. "It’s not going to change the laws. It’s not going to make it where you can walk up and down doing that. It’s more of a privacy thing. It’s more of a medical thing."